November 27, 2023
A free library stands outside the Cancer Institute. It’s just a box of used books mounted on a post, one of those casual collections you see in neighborhoods. Anyone can take a book, the idea is that at some point you leave one. Our daughter Laura went with me to my last appointment. As we left she noticed the library. She opened the plastic door and pulled out Eats Shoots & Leaves by Lynne Truss: It’s (not “Its”) a book about punctuation.
Read this sentence: “A woman, without her man, is nothing.” Then this: “A woman: without her, man is nothing.”
And: “Dear Jack, I want a man who knows what love is all about. You are generous, kind, thoughtful. People who are not like you admit to being useless and inferior. You have ruined me for other men. I yearn for you. I have no feelings whatsoever when we’re apart. I can be forever happy—will you let me be yours? Jill”
Then: “Dear Jack, I want a man who knows what love is. All about you are generous, kind, thoughtful people who are not like you. Admit to being useless and inferior. You have ruined me. For other men I yearn! For you I have no feelings whatsoever. When we’re apart I can be forever happy. Will you let me be? Yours, Jill”
Punctuation. For most of mankind and womankind it’s a monumentally tedious subject. Lynne Truss, a longtime critic and columnist for the Times of London, recognized the epidemic of misuse of punctuation in the U.K. and U.S. In 2002 she started a lighthearted BBC radio series called “Cutting a Dash” about punctuation pitfalls. The show led her the next year to write Eats Shoots & Leaves. Sales are around 500,000 copies in the U.K.
Truss’s book traces the history and function of punctuation: apostrophe, comma, period (in the U.K. called “full stop”), comma, semi-colon, colon, dash, ellipse, exclamation point or “mark” (U.K), question mark, italics, hyphen, and quotation marks, single and double.
If you doubt there’s a chapter’s worth to write about each, read her book.
She writes that some grammarians define punctuation as stitching—the basting that holds the fabric of language in shape. Another describes punctuation marks as the traffic signals of language that tell us to slow down, notice this, take a detour, and stop. So, she asks: what happens when punctuation isn’t used? If punctuation is the stitching of language, without it, “language comes apart and all the buttons fall off.”
In Truss’s elementary school students learned Latin, French, or German grammar but were expected to pick up English grammar by reading, rather than studying it. That led to such puzzles as “its” and “it’s.” What is the apostrophe for?
She writes that “grammatical sticklers are the worst people for finding common cause because it is in their nature … to pick holes in everyone, even their best friends. What an annoying bunch of people.” She says, unhappily, that “my personal hunches about the state of language were horribly correct: standards of punctuation in general in the U.K. are indeed approaching the point of illiteracy; self-justified philistines are truly in the driving seat of our culture.”
The earliest known punctuation, Truss says, is credited to Aristophanes of Byzantium around 200 B.C., who created a three-part system of notation to cue actors when to breathe in preparation for long or short lines. A comma then was the signal for the short line. St. Jerome, who translated the Bible in the 4th century, introduced punctuation to aid pausing when reading aloud. The word “comma” was adopted into English in the 16th century.
She zeroes in on everyday apostrophe glitches, not just “its” instead of “it’s,” but “I’ts party time!” She notes an advertisement for decorative services for “wall’s, ceiling’s, and door’s.” In 2001 a popular TV show created a singing group called Hear’Say. The name, she says, marked a significant milestone on the road to punctuation anarchy.
She lays out the rules for apostrophe use, e.g., possessives, plural and singular (the boy’s hat, the children’s playground, the babies’ bibs) and the rest. She notes the 17 (yes, 17) rules on comma use, principally to illuminate the grammar of a sentence and to highlight, as in musical notation, the literary qualities of rhythm, direction, pitch, tone, and flow. Comma use, she says, requires discretion—that is, common sense: For example: “The convict says the judge is mad.” Then: “The convict, says the judge, is mad.”
Truss gives the same treatment to semi-colons and colons. They propel you forward in a sentence. A colon is nearly always preceded by a full sentence: “Man proposes: God disposes.”
As she walks through all this, Truss agonizes over the creeping substitution of electronic communication, emails and texts, for the printed word, with the presumption that computers and cellphones eliminate the need for punctuation in favor of LOL, IMHO, FWIW, etc.
“The printed word is presented in a linear way,” she writes, “with syntax supreme in conveying the sense of words in their order. … The book remains static and fixed, the reader journeys through it. Picking up the book in the first place entails an active pursuit of understanding. … All these conditions are overturned by the new technologies. Information is presented to us in a non-linear way. … Scrolling documents is the opposite of reading: your eyes remain static, while the material flows past.”
She notes that some users think their keyboard punctuation marks are decorations for creating cartoons like <:-), meaning “dunce,” and so on. She’s appalled especially by emoticons (☹😊).
She goes on: “Even in the knowledge that our punctuation has arrived in its present state by a series of accidents … it is a matter of despair to see punctuation chucked out as worthless by people who don’t know the difference between who’s and whose, and whose bloody automatic ‘grammar checkers’ can’t tell the difference either.”
Yet in her last chapter she writes, “while massive change from the printed word to the bloody electronic signal is inevitably upon us, we diehard punctuation-lovers are perhaps not as rigid as we think we are.”
So, she suggests, we should calm down. Truss and her fellow “sticklers” are working hard for us. We’re probably helpless to stop the unsettling, even bizarre evolution of our language and with it, punctuation. But let’s understand where we’re going, not where were going.